Posted by TMP Webmanager on 21 May 2013 / 0 Comment
By Angelica / @Riotstarz
I am shocked to discover marriage bill creates a system in which fulfilment of human necessities is contingent on legal sanction of one?s relationship. That many people may be forced into unions that could restrict their freedom and safety in order to access necessary services. That this institution creates a mechanism that can be used to beat poor and racialised people and attribute blame for their own oppressions. That it will create a hierarchy of relationships in which those organised in the fashion most amenable to Capital are legally privileged. That it may be used in justification of turning away at the borders those whose relationships are not sufficiently palatable or ?convincing?. ? Oh. Wait. That?s just what marriage has always been.
A reminder, then, that marriage is not ?unequal? merely because of who it excludes, but because of what it fundamentally is. And that whatever needs you have that are currently not met, it is not the lack of marriage that is denying them to you. Again and again: ?I don?t support gay marriage in spite of being a conservative. I support gay marriage because I am a conservative.? So, can we have a bit of, ?You can shove your same-sex marriage up your arse,? at the forthcoming Prides and Dyke Marches?
Original Tweets:
Shocked to discover marriage bill creates a system in which fulfilment of human necessities is contingent on legal sanction of one?s r/ship.
? angelica (@riotstarz) May 20, 2013
?
That many people may be forced into unions that could restrict their freedom and safety in order to access necessary services. ? angelica (@riotstarz) May 20, 2013
?
That it creates a mechanism that can be used to beat poor and racialised people and attribute blame for their own oppressions. ? angelica (@riotstarz) May 20, 2013
?
That it will create a hierarchy of relationships in which those organised in the fashion most amenable to capital are legally privileged. ? angelica (@riotstarz) May 20, 2013
?
That it may be used in justification of turning away at the borders those whose relationships are not sufficiently palatable/?convincing?. ? angelica (@riotstarz) May 20, 2013
?
? Oh. Wait. That?s just what marriage has always been. ? angelica (@riotstarz) May 20, 2013
?
A reminder, then, that marriage is not ?unequal? merely because of who it excludes, but because of what it fundamentally is. ? angelica (@riotstarz) May 20, 2013
?
And that whatever needs you have that are currently not met, it is not the lack of marriage that is denying them to you. ? angelica (@riotstarz) May 20, 2013
Again and again: ?I don?t support gay marriage in spite of being a conservative. I support gay marriage because I am a conservative.?
? angelica (@riotstarz) May 20, 2013
So, can we have a bit of, ?You can shove yr same-sex marriage up yr arse,? at the forthcoming Prides and Dyke Marches?
? angelica (@riotstarz) May 20, 2013
Like this:
Loading?
Source: http://www.tmponline.org/2013/05/21/against-marriage/
jefferson county colorado extenze tenacious d steve smith zou bisou bisou tim tebow press conference tebow press conference
No comments:
Post a Comment